EU criteria for endocrine-disrupting chemicals will not protect health

The European Commission’s proposed criteria for identifying endocrine-disrupting chemicals should be amended, as they will not protect the health of European citizens. In a letter to European Members of Parliament, Wemos and two other organizations call upon the members to reject the current criteria. On September 28th, the Commission ENVI of the European Parliament voted to object to these criteria.

With the letter, Wemos and two other organizations – Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) and Women Engage for a Common Future (WECF International) – express their concerns about the European Commission’s criteria’s flaws. First, the proposed burden of proof for identifying these substances is unrealistically high, which will hamper the process of phasing them out and put our health in danger. In addition, the criteria exempt certain pesticides and biocides intended to disrupt the hormone system, which means that they will continue to be available on the market – and as such harm our health.


Scientific principles

Besides Wemos, HEAL and WECF International, other organizations too want robust criteria for identifying endocrine-disrupting chemicals. For example, the European consumer organization BEUC, the Endocrine Society, and the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) all expressed similar concerns about the public health effects of the current criteria.


Robust criteria are criteria that are based on scientific endocrinological principles. The current criteria do not meet these standards. Wemos applauds the ENVI Commission’s decision to vote against the criteria. However, the last step will take place on October 3rd, when all European Members of Parliament will bring out their final vote.


Read the letter (note: Dutch)

Read more about Wemos’ work on harmful substances

Recent News items

The Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation policy document does not sufficiently address access to healthcare for poorer people


The new policy paper of Minister Schreinemacher of Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, “Doen waar Nederland goed in is (“Doing what the Netherlands is good at”), is very much focused on Dutch business interests and seems to have insufficient attention for realising access to health care for poorer population groups. The Minister indicates that she wants to invest more in public-private collaborations in low- and middle-income countries, also in healthcare. As a result, there is a great risk that healthcare will become more commercial and therefore unaffordable for people with fewer financial resources. To provide good healthcare, the Minister should, instead, contribute to strengthening the capacity and financial resources in the public sector. 

Continue reading

What are best practices to address brain drain of health workers?


What are best (regional) practices when it comes to addressing brain drain – i.e. the emigration of skilled workers, including health workers – and what action is needed on EU level? With this open consultation, the European Commission is interested in feedback on the scale and dynamics of brain drain, and in successful practices and regional strategies and policies to tackle the emigration of qualified workers. Wemos has provided input to the consultation. We recommend, for example, that EU Member States use existing instruments to implement policies and strategies based on evidence, to strengthen their health workforce.

Continue reading