European Parliament votes on European Medicines Agency

On Wednesday March 22nd, the budgetary control committee (CONT) of the European Parliament voted in favour of an amendment on the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This states that EMA must report its activities on protecting clinical trial participants and guaranteeing that trials are conducted according to ethical guidelines. Wemos contributed to this amendment with several MEPs.

The EMA has promised to perform extra checks on clinical trials outside the European Union before drugs are authorized for the European market. Although Wemos has contacted EMA several times about its obligations, it still remains unclear how the organization guarantees that trials are conducted ethically. We hope that this amendment in EMA’s discharge procedure – which is annually approved by the European Parliament – will better protect clinical trial participants.


‘It is great that this amendment has been accepted. This will make EMA more transparent, as it will give us more insight in its activities regarding ethical clinical trials. Medicines that are intended for the EU should not harm clinical trial participants in low-income countries. This amendment enables us to control and monitor this,’ says Bart Staes (MEP Green).



The EMA is responsible for protecting clinical trial participants. Directive 2003/63/EC states that drugs tested in low- and middle-income countries can only be considered for EU marketing authorization if they have been tested according to guidelines, like the Good Clinical Practice or Declaration of Helsinki Guidelines. These guidelines safeguard the protection and health of trial participants. For example, participation must be solely voluntary, and post-trial access to treatment must be guaranteed.


The vulnerability of trial participants

For years now, Wemos has been working on ethical testing of medicines intended for the European market, focusing on the rights of those in low- and middle-income countries who participate in clinical trials. Our research in this area points to the following conclusions:

  • Due to limited access to healthcare, clinical trials are often the only way for participants in low- and middle-income countries to get treatment. But this means that they are in fact participating involuntarily – they have no other choice. And often, the risks of participating in a trial are neglected. This makes them vulnerable.
  • When a trial participant is physically harmed as a result of the trial, it is often difficult to get post-trial access to treatment or compensation.


Read more about our work on Medicines

Read our report on clinical trials in Egypt

Recent News items

This week: 72nd World Health Assembly


From May 20-28, the 72nd session of the World Health Assembly (WHA) will take place in Geneva, Switzerland. Each year, senior health officials from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Member States gather there to discuss the WHO’s progress, new goals and global health agenda and challenges. Wemos will be present as well as a civil society organization and attend sessions on Financing for Health, the Global Action Plan for Healthy Lives and Well-being and Access to Medicines.

Continue reading

Overpriced drugs developed with tax money


Research shows major Dutch public investments in drug development


Overpriced, a report published today jointly by The Centre for Research on Multinational Corporation (SOMO) and Wemos, examines the extent of Dutch public funding of drug development, through donations, loans and/or investments. This funding occurs both directly by financing development of new medicines, and indirectly through investments made into biotech companies, but channelled through universities, public research bodies, and national and regional investment funds. The report reveals, however, that because no conditions are set on these investments, the Government loses its chance to curb subsequent high drug prices.

Continue reading