Financiering

FINANCE FOR HEALTH

Health systems that are responsive to the needs of the population and accessible to everyone – women and men, regardless of their income – require sufficient public funding. Health is not a market for business, but a universal human right.

Evidence shows that public resources and country-specific health financing strategies are key to realising the right to health. It is a public responsibility to ensure equitable access to essential health services for all.

 

However, in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), health budgets are not sufficient to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), or recruit and retain the necessary number of health workers. Health expenditure often relies too heavily on out-of-pocket spending, pushing many people into poverty and exacerbating inequalities.

Finance for a sustainable health workforce

If we aim to achieve sustainable results in strengthening countries’ health systems – which is a prerequisite for sexual and reproductive health and rights –including the health workforce, it is crucial to expand countries’ fiscal space for health. Yet, this should not be left to individual countries alone; many countries still depend on official development assistance (ODA) for health to co-finance their health systems. However, this type of ODA is decreasing. Instead, World Bank and donor countries – the Netherlands included – spend relatively more ODA to engage and strengthen the private-for-profit sector, also in health.

 

Wemos believes that the international community can and should contribute more to the strengthening of countries’ health budgets. This can be done by increasing and better aligning development assistance for health with country-specific strategies on the one hand, and by reducing practices that needlessly limit government budget (for health) on the other hand.

Health financing, gender and other cross-cutting issues

When we talk about financial access to health services, we see that women are disadvantaged. Both national policies on health financing and macroeconomic policies can contribute to these gender inequalities.  In countries with high out-of-pocket spending, women face extra barriers to essential health services. This is because women suffer more from constrained cash flow, and because out-of-pocket spending is often required in sexual and reproductive health services – including family planning methods – that particularly affect women, their health, career and household income.

 

International financing institutions, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), also have a large impact on health policies and fiscal space for health through their advice and conditions related to loans. Wage bill ceilings in the public health sector and restrictions on the use of ODA for health worker salaries negatively affect women, who form the grand majority of health care professionals.

 

Therefore, we incorporate gender and equity into our analyses and evidence-building, and join up with partners to effectively advocate gender equality in health policies.

 

We also address cross-cutting issues like the accountability of multilateral organisations and high-income countries towards LMICs, and meaningful civil society engagement in decision-making within this programme.

Wemos calls for strengthening the pool of public resources for health

Change needed

In our Finance for health programme, we wish to contribute to the following:

  • Bilateral and multilateral development partners increase and align their ODA to co-finance UHC strategies in countries that cannot raise sufficient domestic public resources.
  • International financial institutions and development partners actively support the efforts of LMICs to increase their fiscal space for health, by strengthening national and international tax justice measures and by phasing out harmful policy conditionalities that unduly limit a country’s spending options for social services.
  • Where development partners use ODA to promote business involvement in health in LMICs, they apply criteria to ensure that this: 1) helps the countries in question to attain health-specific development goals, and does not cause harm, and 2) respects aid effectiveness principles.
  • Civil society organisations have both the capacity and opportunity to effectively monitor and influence finance for health at both national and international levels, and to advocate alternative financing models where appropriate.

 

Read more

See our Aid for Trade page

Is blended finance the key to health and development?

Barbara Fienieg How can we better align our spending and finance with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS)? This was one of the central questions at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) third high-level annual conference 'Private Finance for Sustainable Development’, held in Paris on January 29th 2020. On January 28th, I participated as [...]

Accelerating progress towards UHC at PMAC 2020

What are some challenges and trends for the next decade in accelerating progress towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC)? How can we move from commitment to action? These (and related) questions will be discussed from Jan 28-Feb 2 at the Prince Mahidol Award Conference (PMAC) in Bangkok, an annual international conference focusing on policy-related health [...]

Wemos endorsed the Kampala Declaration

Is aid stabilizing or overcoming an unfair global trade regime? Is it distorting or supporting national health systems? Is civil society represented and heard in global processes? How can we move from aid to global solidarity beyond aid? These were some of the tough questions that civil society from various countries discussed last October and [...]

This was the year 2019: our highlights

What an eventful year it has been. 2019 was filled with collaborations, workshops, new publications, media moments, and mutual learning sessions. And it was the anniversary year in which we looked back on 40 years of our work in protecting global public health. We’re ready for 2020! Last year we gained widespread media attention – [...]

sustainable development goals

How healthy is a ‘healthy’ economy? A closer look into SDG goals

To realise the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) everywhere, governments should abandon Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth as a policy objective and place more emphasis on SDG17 on global co-operation. That is one of the main conclusions of the paper ‘ ‘How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? Incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8’ by [...]

Best public value for public money?

Wemos conducted a case study on the application of Dutch Official Development Assistance (ODA) policy instruments for business strengthening in the healthcare context. With our discussion paper "'Best Public value for public money?' The case of match-funded multi-hospital infrastructure development in Tanzania", we share the findings and key points from the in-depth discussions of those [...]